Archive for December 2014
I hate to reblog such ignorant propaganda, but it is sometimes necessary to highlight the vehement hate of an elitist ignoramus to; I doubt this comment will be published, but you, Sir are either an imbecile or sadly ignorant.
The proletariat of this and other countries have been abused physically, emotionally and economically for decades by such profane and archaic opinion.
Why do we support wars that encourage greed and oppression, while allowing truly oppressive regimes, vis-à-vis Saudi Arabia to continue to abuse their citizens and deprive them of the wealth a small minority of their elite enjoys?
When you talk of ‘irreversible’ agenda implemented by socialist governments, do you not mean ‘popular’ and it has taken decades to subliminally alter the mind set of those these socialist agenda actually help, offering the fruits of their labour as individuals when you truly know the fruits of one’s labour only become evident through redistribution of wealth, whether through higher wages or effective social policy?
Rarely have I heard such drivel; rather I should be deaf or blind before I need to hear or see the like again.
Labour governments always implement policies that are designed to be irreversible. They do this so that when they get back in office they can carry on from where they left off. This is done to eventually bring about a socialist Britain. This is the main reason that Labour and the left hate Margaret Thatcher. The irrepressible Maggie managed to reverse that which was supposed to be irreversible.
The last Labour government had policies of open door immigration and encouraging a culture of benefit dependence. Both these policies were designed to be irreversible.
Labour’s benefit culture was designed to make people dependant on the state and be irreversible. If people are suffering now it’s because Labour intentionally locked them in poverty and the lock was designed not to be broken.
Labour callously made lots of people vulnerable in such a way that it would be difficult to stop them being vulnerable…
View original post 180 more words
Well, here’s the truth, folks.
Fox hunting is not only abhorrent in its concept and practice, it is also unpopular!
The wealthy not just chasing down small animals on the backs of huge horses with packs of hounds, but also riding (literally) roughshod over the rights of their tenant farmers, too afraid of the economic consequences to oppose them!
Well, bring your horse onto my garden in pursuit of a fox, and I’ll cripple ya, given half a chance.
We’re constantly told the debate about hunting is a matter of rural opinion vs urban opinion.
Well not according to this opinion poll by IPSOS MORI.
According to their survey, exactly the same percentage of rural inhabitants – 80% – are against fox hunting as urban inhabitants – also 80%.
And even more surprisingly, slightly more people who live in the country (89% and 94%) are against hare coursing and badger baiting than townies (87% and 92%).
The truth is that the Countryside Alliance and the National Farmers Union are NOT representative of rural opinion.
In fact the NFU is not even representative of farmers – they only represent a mere 18% of them, mostly the richest landowners:
But the question is, if the public in both rural and urban areas is so solidly against fox hunting, why…
View original post 56 more words
Nick Clegg has been found alive and ‘well’ at a flat in East London.
When asked for comment he said “Oh, it’s just my second home, to which I am entitled, paid for by the taxpayer; Gideon- I mean George is a regular- often pops in to buy a kilo or two of our… errr… product. He sometimes stays a while.
Everything’s fine- vote LibDem in May. Were are of the people and for the people.”
When I was born in 1957, evil people were easy to spot; they wore turbans, spoke with an Irish lilt, were differently pigmented or just had horns.
Nowadays they wear suits and sit on plush, green leather seats.
I think if we were in pre- AD Jerusalem, Cameron, Osborne and Drunken-Smith would be busy at the temple, Christ would tip over their tables, laden with ill-gotten gains; they would take him to the judiciary who, in cahoots with them would sentence him to a prolonged and painful death.
Both parties would claim the other was at fault, but both equally guilty.
And the poor would still be poor; the disenfranchised still so; the rich still laughing.
We all need to be a sort of Christ, and fight inequality wherever we find it, as best we can.
Was Christ a revolutionary? Bet your ass he was!
I am becoming so much more inclined towards violent revolution.
It is not what I want, and yet what do I see for the future of my children unless we refuse the yoke of capitalism?
How can I, as a father ensure the future of my children while the banker decides their fate?
This is not me; I try to be the voice of the people; in some small way, perhaps I am; but you- what will you say to your children?
(not satire – it’s the UK today)
Over a hundred and seventy years after Dickens published a Christmas Carol, meet Ebenezer Scrooge 2014:
You can read all about how Moulton sacked his staff and couldn’t even be bothered to tell them here:
But Moulton is not just a fabulously wealthy fat city cat who doesn’t give a sh*t about British workers. He’s a prominent UKIP supporter too. And a good example of just how nasty some of the people behind UKIP are.
Here are some quotes:
Moulton on making people redundant: “You can never fire anyone too soon”
Moulton’s description of the people he has fired: “cutting away unnecessaries”
Moulton on why there should be even more austerity: “It’s the moral thing to do and it’s the right thing to do.”
Moulton on why…
View original post 184 more words